目的 本研究通过整理藏药和羌药交叉使用品种，分析藏医和羌医对药材临床使用的异同。方法 查阅《中国民族药辞典》，以拉丁文字母A-Z顺序筛选藏药、羌药交叉使用品种，统计其药名、拉丁学名、科名、药用部位、功效、治疗疾病系统，分析交叉使用品种的药用部位及疗效的相似性与差异性、治疗疾病特点。结果 共整理出206种藏羌交叉使用品种，其中植物药174种、动物药22种，矿物药5种，其他类5种，科分布区类型占比最多的为世界广布型。藏药以果实及种子类、花类、皮类、茎木类较多，羌药以根及根茎类、全草、全株、叶类较多。交叉使用品种中功效相似或主功效有交叉的品种占比近82.04%，主功效不同的品种占比约17.96%。藏药功效包含羌药功效的药材比例较大，藏药突出于治疗消化系统疾病、泌尿生殖系统疾病、某些传染病和寄生虫病，羌药在骨折等骨科疾病的治疗方面具有优势，藏药治疗疾病类型普遍比羌药广泛。结论 藏羌交叉使用品种功效相似性明显，差异性不可忽略，分析认为两个民族用药经验历史上有过交流与借鉴。本研究为藏医药与羌医药源流探索提供了路径；亦为进一步开发藏羌药资源提供参考。

Objective This study sorted out the shared-use medicines by Tibetan medicine and Qiang medicine and analyzed the similarities and dissimilarities of these two medical systems in the clinical use of medicinal materials.Methods By referring to the Dictionary of Chinese ethnic medicine, the shared-use varieties of Tibetan medicine and Qiang medicine were selected in the order of Latin letters A-Z, the drug name, Latin scientific name, family name, medicinal parts, efficacy and disease treatment system were counted, and the similarities and differences of medicinal parts and efficacy and disease treatment characteristics of the shared-use medicines were analyzed.Results A total of 206 shared-use medicines in TM and QM were listed, including 174 kinds of plant drugs, 22 kinds of animal drugs, 5 kinds of mineral drugs and 5 kinds of other types. The type with the largest proportion of family distribution area is the world wide distribution type. Tibetan medicine uses more fruits, seeds, flowers,bark and stems, while Qiang medicine uses more roots, rhizomes, whole grass, whole plant and leaves. Among the shared-use medicines, the varieties with similar efficacy or cross main efficacy accounted for nearly 82.04%, and the varieties with different main efficacy accounted for about 17.96%. The effect of Tibetan medicine contains the effect of Qiang medicine accounted for a large proportion, Tibetan medicine is more prominent in the treatment of digestive system diseases, urogenital system diseases, some infectious diseases and parasitic diseases. Qiang medicine has more advantages in the treatment of orthopedic diseases such as fractures, Tibetan medicine generally treats more types of diseases than Qiang medicine.Conclusion The efficacy of shared-use medicines is mainly similar, and the difference cannot be ignored, the analysis shows that the drug use experience of the two nationalities has been exchanged and used for reference in history. This study provides a path for exploring the origin of Tibetan medicine and Qiang medicine; It also provides a reference for the further development of Tibetan and Qiang medicine resources.

R291.408

四川省中医药管理局中医药科学技术研究专项项目（2018PC010）：全国第四次中药资源普查2018年度第二批外业调查研究-茂县、理县,负责人：兰志琼。